Re: Experiences with extensibility

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experiences with extensibility
Date: 2008-01-09 08:06:45
Message-ID: 47848095.5050202@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Sim Zacks wrote:

> We use postgresql because it is open source, we have in-house experience
> to deal with it so we don't have any extra support costs and we don't
> need the features that are offered in commercial products that
> PostGreSQL does not have. We also don't need the speed that commercial
> products offer that is missing in PostgreSQL.

I use PostgreSQL because it has a ton of features the closed source
products don't offer and is generally faster than the closed source
solutions.

Granted there are scenarios where others are FASTER (SELECT COUNT(*))
but I find that if you are doing those items, you normally have a weird
design anyway.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rayudu Madhava 2008-01-09 09:24:34 PgSql Mirroring/Fail Over Server
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-01-09 08:04:30 Re: Connect to SQL Server via ODBC from Postgresql