Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)

From: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)
Date: 2008-01-08 22:36:51
Message-ID: 4783FB03.80500@esilo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> That said, we have been a little dismayed in the lack of comment.
>
> Personally, I'm ignoring this thread, as well as the one on
> partitioning, because I'm up to my arse in 8.3-release alligators.
> I'm going to try hard not to think about any 8.4 development issues
> until 8.3 is actually out the door and we branch for 8.4 development.
>
> I can't say how many other people are equally pressed for time ...
> but seeing the minimal attention that seems to be getting paid to
> open 8.3 issues, it doesn't look to me like the community as a whole
> has a lot of spare cycles right now.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

Thanks for the heads up. We had a feeling the 8.3 crunch was a factor.
We don't want to slow that down because we were are waiting for 8.3 to
perform yet another mysql to postgresql migration :)

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-08 23:21:27 Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2008-01-08 22:33:51 Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)