| From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) |
| Date: | 2008-01-08 22:36:51 |
| Message-ID: | 4783FB03.80500@esilo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> That said, we have been a little dismayed in the lack of comment.
>
> Personally, I'm ignoring this thread, as well as the one on
> partitioning, because I'm up to my arse in 8.3-release alligators.
> I'm going to try hard not to think about any 8.4 development issues
> until 8.3 is actually out the door and we branch for 8.4 development.
>
> I can't say how many other people are equally pressed for time ...
> but seeing the minimal attention that seems to be getting paid to
> open 8.3 issues, it doesn't look to me like the community as a whole
> has a lot of spare cycles right now.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
Thanks for the heads up. We had a feeling the 8.3 crunch was a factor.
We don't want to slow that down because we were are waiting for 8.3 to
perform yet another mysql to postgresql migration :)
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-08 23:21:27 | Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-01-08 22:33:51 | Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) |