| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Memory on 32bit machine |
| Date: | 2008-01-08 04:56:49 |
| Message-ID: | 47830291.7060006@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greg Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> Certainly and iptables gives you some flexibility in connection
>> availability "before" it hits the actual database but without having
>> to jimmy the production firewall.
>
> 4) Funky tricks with things like port forwarding and filtering that you
> can't do with PostgreSQL alone, and that need to be active for people in
> the internal LAN. I recall this one time where I needed the database
> port to be different based on which of the local subnets the connection
> was coming through (it was a version migration thing). Those were some
> fun ipchains rules (yeah, that long ago) and I'd have been hard pressed
> to do that on the firewall instead without a major contortion to the
> network.
Some people won't like this but... packet shaping and bandwidth control
as well.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rajaram J | 2008-01-08 05:11:48 | postgres dump cores |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-01-08 04:49:23 | Re: Memory on 32bit machine |