Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>, Igor Kovalenko <Igor(dot)Kovalenko(at)motorola(dot)com>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Date: 2002-05-06 13:40:36
Message-ID: 4779.1020692436@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> We could get around this, of course: record the port number in the data
>> directory lockfile, and test for existence of the old socket
>> independently of trying to create a new one. But it seems ugly.

> How about a second, data directory based socket simply named something
> like '.inuse', that is not port dependent?

Hmm ... but how do you use that to tell if there are still backends
around?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-05-06 13:43:15 Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-06 13:36:02 Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime