Re: Pg default's verbosity?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Date: 2012-06-19 06:15:43
Message-ID: 4771.1340086543@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
> we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though. IME, the following two
> messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:

> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "foo_a_seq" for
> serial column "foo.a"
> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
> "foo_pkey" for table "foo"

Personally, I'd have no problem with flat-out dropping (not demoting)
both of those two specific messages. I seem to recall that Bruce has
lobbied for them heavily in the past, though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-06-19 06:21:16 Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-06-19 06:09:41 Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks