| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, dmitry(at)koterov(dot)ru, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.3.4 reproducible crash |
| Date: | 2008-12-12 14:01:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4770.1229090509@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> 1. Ensure that a snapshot is set before doing parse analysis of any
>> non-utility command.
> I think this is the easiest way out, and the most robust -- we won't be
> bitten by some other operation that the parser may think of doing.
Yeah. I think we probably have to do that in any case because we have
an assumption that datatype input routines are allowed to make use of
a snapshot (see comments in fastpath.c for instance). The fact that
no one's noticed this crash before suggests that none of the common ones
actually do, but I don't think we want to back off that assumption.
There's still a question of whether we want to alter the treatment of
record-type input to make the handling of embedded domains more uniform,
but that's something for the future.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-12 14:05:21 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2008-12-12 14:00:52 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |