Re: foreign key constraint, planner ignore index.

From: Andrew Nesheret <andrew(at)infinet(dot)ru>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: foreign key constraint, planner ignore index.
Date: 2007-12-21 06:19:58
Message-ID: 476B5B0E.5040907@infinet.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Richard Huxton wrote:
> Hmm - not seeing that here. Is it just that your machine has a very
> variable workload? The times above are far enough apart from the times
> below that I'm not sure they can be trusted.
>
> What if you run it 10 times - do the times stay consistent?
stay consistent and this test has exclusive access to postgres and no
other activites on this system.

Thank you Richard! And my question is. What should i do further ?

--
__________________________________
WBR, Andrew Nesheret ICQ:10518066

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ivan.hou 2007-12-21 07:48:08 update pg question?
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2007-12-21 05:47:18 Re: Composite types for composite primary/foreign keys?