From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: autoconf trouble in the CVS HEAD |
Date: | 2007-12-19 02:19:54 |
Message-ID: | 47687FCA.6000403@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>>
>>> I found a tiny fix for configure.in at Nov 26.
>>>
>>> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/configure.in.diff?r1=1.537;r2=1.538;f=h
>>>
>>> It seems to me this check enforces us to use autoconf 2.59, not the latest one.
>>> Is there any reason for this change?
>>>
>>> For example, autoconf 2.61 is installed in the Fedora 7, 8 and rawhide,
>>> so this chage will be troubled for many developers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Who does this affect in practice? You don't need to run autoconf to
>> build postgres, only to change it.
>>
>
> Indeed, you are correct.
> It is not affect for _many_ developers. :)
>
> However, I added a new configure option (--enable-selinux) in my branch,
> so I got a trouble on running autoconf.
>
> I want to know the reason why the version of autoconf is fixed, to avoid
> this trouble with an appropriate way in my branch.
>
>
>
See discussion thread starting here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-11/msg00706.php
cheers
andreew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2007-12-19 02:49:48 | Re: autoconf trouble in the CVS HEAD |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2007-12-19 02:09:10 | Re: autoconf trouble in the CVS HEAD |