Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
Date: 2007-12-13 16:40:49
Message-ID: 47616091.40300@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Just FYI, it's going to be difficult to replace the name of the feature in
>> the PR docs at this point; I already have 11 translations. What's *wrong*
>> with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it
>> for 6 months?
>
> Is a translator really not able to change 3 words in a week? Come again.
>
I think it is likely more about being able to reach the translators. The
more common ones such as yourself are obvious but others may not be.

Either way, I think that the change is valid and we need to do it.

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-12-13 17:34:52 Re: [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-12-13 11:45:18 Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-12-13 17:34:52 Re: [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-12-13 15:21:04 Re: VLDB Features