| From: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Date created for tables |
| Date: | 2019-12-06 01:12:22 |
| Message-ID: | 476113e0-5c57-b56f-ba62-efbfe4839a72@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/5/19 1:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Chloe Dives <Chloe(dot)Dives(at)cantabcapital(dot)com> writes:
>> Having moved to PostgreSQL from Oracle a few years ago I have been generally very impressed by Postgres, but there are a few things that I still miss. One of those is being able to see the created and last modified dates for database objects.
>> Is this something that has been considered for implementation?
> It's been considered, and rejected, many times. Aside from the overhead
> involved, there are too many different ideas of what such dates ought to
> mean (e.g., what should happen during dump/restore? does a failed
> transaction update last-modified? etc etc). You can search the
> project's mailing list archives if you want to read the prior discussions.
All the other RDBMSs seem to have figured it out.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-12-06 01:40:36 | Re: Date created for tables |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2019-12-05 19:10:25 | Re: Date created for tables |