Re: Altering field passed as parameter to plpgsql trigger

From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Altering field passed as parameter to plpgsql trigger
Date: 2007-12-12 20:39:17
Message-ID: 476046F5.6040501@pinpointresearch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Richard Huxton wrote:
> Steve Crawford wrote:
>
>> What is the correct syntax for the line:
>> new.field_to_alter = some_computed_value;
>
> Can't be done in plpgsql - it's too static a language. On first call,
> that assignments basically gets compiled into a planned query and from
> then on you're stuck.
>
> You can use pl/tcl or pl/perl etc. since they're more dynamic.
Great. I'll use another approach.

>> Also, does plpgsql have a preferred way to identify the table that
>> fired the trigger. I see the syntax for C but not for plpgsql.
>
> TG_RELNAME / TG_TABLE_NAME - it's in the plpgsql/triggers section of
> the manual.
>
Thanks. I did find that after another cup of coffee. :)

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-12-12 20:44:45 Re: Better alternative for Primary Key then serial??
Previous Message pilzner 2007-12-12 20:28:37 Re: Better alternative for Primary Key then serial??