From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Leigh Dyer <leigh(at)eclinic(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Multiple clusters on one box for PITR |
Date: | 2007-12-12 13:49:56 |
Message-ID: | 475FE704.10004@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Leigh Dyer wrote:
>
> However, I'm running on the Debian Etch packages, which seem to make it
> quite easy to run multiple clusters, enabling me to run PITR just on the
> application that requires it. Would running separate clusters on the one
> box for these two applications be a sensible thing to do? Are there
> resource limits that I should be aware of? Any other issues?
There's no problem running multiple copies of PG on the same box - lots
of the developers do it, and I do on my laptop here. Different data-dir
and port and you're away.
Efficiency can be an issue though - you'll have two sets of WAL files
being written to, and two separate sections of shared memory to balance.
If you're not pushing the hardware though, it should be straightforward
enough.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Broersma Jr | 2007-12-12 13:57:48 | Re: Creating Aggregate functions in PLpgSQL |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-12-12 13:48:04 | Re: Instaltiating an ARRAY within a function |