Re: slony question

From: Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: slony question
Date: 2007-12-11 01:19:10
Message-ID: 475DE58E.9090103@serioustechnology.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 2:19 PM, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> wrote:
>> joshques(at)gmail(dot)com ("Josh Harrison") writes:
>>> Does slony support postgres major version upgrade ? ie., will it
>>> replicate between different major versions?
>> Yes, that's one of the major "use cases" for Slony-I.
>>
>> Version 1.0 and 1.1 support (loosely) from PostgreSQL 7.3 to 8.1-ish.
>>
>> Version 1.2 dropped 7.3 support, but supports up to (just about;
>> there's a patch not in a 1.2 release that is needed for late-breaking
>> 8.3 changes) 8.3.
>
> Didn't 1.2 drop support for pg 7.4 as well? I thought I remembered
> reading that some time ago.

Not according to the docs:

http://slony.info/documentation/requirements.html
Section 3.1, 3rd bullet:

You also need a recent version of PostgreSQL source. Slony-I depends on
namespace support so you must have PostgreSQL version 7.3.3 or newer to
be able to build and use Slony-I.

It says the same thing in the Slony 1.2.12 docs rpm.

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-12-11 02:10:19 Re: SQL design pattern for a delta trigger?
Previous Message Erik Jones 2007-12-11 01:01:31 Re: partitioned table query question