| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
| Date: | 2007-12-07 06:16:08 |
| Message-ID: | 4758E528.2090507@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
> If we do want to keep credits in the SGML pages, how extensive should
> they be? I already took it on myself to remove Gene Selkov's snailmail
> address, but do we even want email addresses there? A lot of them are
> probably dead, and the ones that aren't are causing their owners to get
> extra spam, because an <email> link is about the easiest thing to scrape
> from a webpage that there could possibly be.
Historically, the only way to troubleshoot some of the contrib modules
was to e-mail the author. If people think that we've reached a standard
that everything in /contrib is now well-documented and supported by the
general community, the I suppose we don't need contact information. I'm
not so sure myself.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-07 06:21:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-12-07 04:50:37 | Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-07 06:21:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-12-07 04:50:37 | Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint" |