Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Date: 2015-11-03 23:47:29
Message-ID: 4755.1446594449@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca> writes:
>>> [ 20151006b_postgres_fdw_extensions.patch ]

>> There might be a case for raising a WARNING during
>> postgres_fdw_validator(), but no more than that, IMO. Certainly ERROR
>> during regular use of the server is right out.

> Agreed. I don't know whether it's better to emit a WARNING or some
> lower-level message (INFO, DEBUG), but I think an ERROR will suck due
> to the pg_dump issues you mention.

I've committed this with a WARNING during validation and no comment
otherwise.

I left out the proposed regression tests because they fail in "make
installcheck" mode, unless you've previously built and installed cube
and seg, which seems like an unacceptable requirement to me. I don't
think that leaving the code untested is a good final answer, of course.
The idea I was toying with was to create a dummy extension for testing
purposes by means of doing a direct INSERT into pg_extension --- which
is ugly and would only work for superusers, but the latter is true of
"CREATE EXTENSION cube" too. Anybody have a better idea?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Ramsey 2015-11-04 00:11:00 Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-11-03 23:40:36 Re: fortnight interval support