From: | andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net |
---|---|
To: | "Tatsuo Ishii" <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgbench enhancements |
Date: | 2006-07-26 15:52:33 |
Message-ID: | 4754.68.143.134.146.1153929153.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have committed contrib/pgbench enhanments contributed by Tomoaki
>> > Sato from SRA OSS, Inc. Japan.
>> >
>> > - predefined variable "tps"
>> > The value of variable tps is taken from the scaling factor
>> > specified by -s option.
>> >
>> > - -D option
>> > Variable values can be defined by -D option.
>> >
>> > - \set command now allows arithmetic calculations.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Was there a previous patch posted for this? I don't recall seeing it.
>
> Are you saying that I should have posted patches and called for
> discussion? I omit the step because a) pgbench is a contrib program,
> b) the changes do not break the backward compatibility.
>
> I always call for discussions for questionable part. (for example,
> column type change proposal for pgbench tables).
It's not a big deal, but I was under the impression that even in these
circumstances a patch should be posted first, especially if it changes
user visible behaviour.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-07-26 15:54:31 | Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti |
Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2006-07-26 15:49:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |