From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL |
Date: | 2007-11-29 20:45:45 |
Message-ID: | 474F24F9.7000706@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
>> I think a reasonable compromise is to turn the ereport() in _dosmaperr
>> to DEBUG1 instead. That way it won't clutter any log by default, and in
>> the cases where we're actually interested in tracking the problematic
>> situation, we don't need to get huge amounts of log traffic coming from
>> other parts of the system.
>
> I'm still not convinced what you think the problematic situation is.
> It's already the case (and reasonable, I think) that _dosmaperr issues a
> LOG message if it sees a GetLastError code it doesn't recognize; that
> addresses the problem that this thread started with. Why do we need to
> make the success case chattier?
I believe Alvaros point is that several different GetLastError codes map
to the same errno code, making it impossible to see the difference
between those errors.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-29 20:59:44 | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-29 20:43:39 | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL |