Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today
Date: 2007-11-27 20:07:17
Message-ID: 474C78F5.6030709@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>>> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>>> I see that there are two or three minor bug fixes in the REL7_3_STABLE
>>> branch since 7.3.20. Rather than just leaving those to rot, maybe the
>>> actual policy should be "only one more update after 8.3 comes out".
>
>> I assume you no longer need to maintain it for Redhat then?
>
> Well, I still do, nominally, but RHEL-3 is in maintenance mode (meaning
> no more scheduled updates). It would take a fairly serious bug to get
> Red Hat's attention to the point that they'd want to turn the package.
> If something like that came up, very possibly we'd want to put out a
> fix too. What I'm thinking is more along the lines of not bothering
> with back-patching non-catastrophic bugs, and not automatically
> including 7.3 in the set of branches we make back-branch releases for.

OK, well +1 for dropping it from me then.

/D

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-11-27 20:07:41 Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-11-27 20:06:01 Re: psql -f doesn't complain about directories