Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

> On Apr 22, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>> On 04/22/2014 06:43 PM, Mark Wong wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com <mailto:jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/22/2014 08:26 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> I'm going away tomorrow for a few days R&R. when I'm back next
>> week I
>> will set up a demo client running this module. If you can have
>> a machine
>> prepped for this purpose by then so much the better, otherwise
>> I will
>> have to drag out a box I recently rescued and have been
>> waiting for
>> something to use it with. It's more important that it's stable
>> (i.e.
>> nothing else running on it) than that it's very powerful. It
>> could be
>>
>> running Ubuntu or some Redhattish variant or, yes, even FreeBSD.
>>
>>
>> This is best handled by Mark. Mark can you help Andrew with this?
>> I assume we would use the DL385 with the MS70?
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I can help. But let me know if Alfred's offer is preferred.
>
>
> I don't think they are mutually exclusive, but I'd rather start off with one machine. I would find it easiest if it were on something like CentOS6.5.
>
> When we have that running and reporting like we want it we can add a FreeBSD server.
>
> The idea is that these machines would be available for a long time, ideally quite a few years. We want to have them with a stable time series of performance data so that when something disturbs the performance it sticks out like a sore thumb.

Ok, centos 6.4 is on there now, I'll try to get that upgraded within a few days or so. I'll keep you posted.

Regards,
Mark