From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Rudolf van der Leeden <vanderleeden(at)logicunited(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PG 8.3beta3 Segmentation Fault during Database Restore |
Date: | 2007-11-27 15:52:40 |
Message-ID: | 474C3D48.4070909@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Rudolf van der Leeden wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been trying to test a backup/restore of our production database
> (26GB on disk) using PG 8.2.4 as backup and PG 8.3beta3 for the restore.
>
> FIRST TRY:
> pg_dump (v8.3beta3) --format=c the PG 8.2.4 database .... OK
> pg_restore into a brandnew PG 8.3beta3 database ....
> Segmentation fault after ~10min
> From the serverlog:
> 2007-11-27 11:03:27 CET [7133] LOG: server process (PID 7337) was
> terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
> 2007-11-27 11:03:27 CET [7235] CONTEXT: COPY login_session, line
> 9210986
>
> SECOND TRY:
> Increased the loglevel to DEBUG1
> pg_dump (v8.2.4) --format=p the PG 8.2.4 database into an
> ASCII file (31 GB) .... OK
> psql-restore into a brandnew PG 8.3beta3 database ....
> Segmentation fault after ~2hours
> From the serverlog:
> 2007-11-27 15:56:38 CET [15833] STATEMENT: CREATE INDEX
> login_session_promotion_id ON login_session USING btree (promotion_id);
> 2007-11-27 15:56:38 CET [15833] ERROR: concurrent insert in progress
> 2007-11-27 15:56:38 CET [15833] STATEMENT: CREATE INDEX
> login_session_web_site_id ON login_session USING btree (web_site_id);
> 2007-11-27 15:56:50 CET [21670] DEBUG: autovacuum: processing
> database "gaia"
> 2007-11-27 15:57:58 CET [15726] LOG: server process (PID 15833) was
> terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
> 2007-11-27 15:57:58 CET [15726] LOG: terminating any other active
> server processes
>
> What could be the cause of this problem? Is it a bug or my fault?
> The postgres.crash.log is enclosed.
>
>
The general rule is: use pg_dump from the target version. So your first
attempt was more correct.
Just curious: what happens if you turn autovacuum off before starting
the restore?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sulfinu | 2007-11-27 15:55:09 | Re: String encoding during connection "handshake" |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-11-27 15:52:17 | Re: [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[] |