Re: CAN-2005-0247

From: yo mero <debianier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CAN-2005-0247
Date: 2005-02-25 20:48:12
Message-ID: 474978b205022512484745a27b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:40:25 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> yo mero <debianier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Hello I saw this :
> > http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2005-0247
> > is 8.0.1 Safe ?
>
> No --- at least not the source-code releases. Red Hat's 8.0.1 RPMs
> include the patch, and I think the latest community RPMs do too.
>
> > is there a patch ?
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/gram.y.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.64.4.1&r2=text&tr2=1.64.4.3
>
> The patches for other branches besides 8.0 are available from CVS
> as well.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

patched , compiled, postgresql restarted

thank you

leonel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-02-25 21:41:12 Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-02-25 20:44:47 Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report