Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Date: 2007-11-18 03:06:07
Message-ID: 473FAC1F.6030903@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark wrote:
> Why is configure even checked in to CVS?
>
>
>

Right now you don't even need autoconf installed to build out of CVS. Do
we want to impose that as an extra requirement? And if we did it would
need to be the same one used to cut tarballs, or one provably compatible.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-18 18:42:04 pgsql: Remove no-longer-accurate claim that REINDEX won't invalidate
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-17 21:13:42 pgsql: Wordsmith improvements to first half of release notes, move TEXT

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-11-18 12:28:18 Re: High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix
Previous Message Russell Smith 2007-11-18 02:59:31 Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples