| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: change to interfaces.html |
| Date: | 2007-11-16 17:13:52 |
| Message-ID: | 473DCFD0.3080900@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces pgsql-www |
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> I should make it clear that I do not believe that is JD/Command Prompt's
>> intention - JD has stated a number of times that they follow the more
>> liberal interpretation.
>
> So what exactly is this argument about, then?
The reason why (imho) psqlODBC should be listed more prominently on the
website than the CommandPrompt driver. Licencing came into it because I
pointed out there is confusion over the appropriateness of the GPL for
an ODBC driver due to the way the linking/runtime loading happens.
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-11-16 17:27:18 | Re: change to interfaces.html |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-11-16 16:56:43 | Re: change to interfaces.html |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-11-16 17:20:26 | Re: New pgsql-advocacy description |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-11-16 16:56:43 | Re: change to interfaces.html |