| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, Magne Mæhre <Magne(dot)Mahre(at)sun(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm |
| Date: | 2007-11-15 04:01:44 |
| Message-ID: | 473BC4A8.7040304@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2007 10:12 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> http://www.intel.com/performance/server/xeon/intspd.htm
>> http://www.intel.com/performance/server/xeon/fpspeed.htm
>
> That says precisely nothing about the matter at hand. Someone should
> simply change it and benchmark it in pgsql. I doubt you'll see a
> difference there on regular AMD/Intel ... and if it makes the sun
> hyperthreaded cpu happier...
Are you offering?
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-11-15 04:51:05 | Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm |
| Previous Message | Gregory Maxwell | 2007-11-15 03:22:20 | Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm |