Re: Allow escape in application_name

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Allow escape in application_name
Date: 2021-10-12 04:25:01
Message-ID: 4737ce62-6d46-49e9-e687-3468c6e13ea4@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/10/07 11:46, kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> So now we can choose from followings:
>
> * ignore such differences and use isdigit() and strtol()
> * give up using them and implement two static support functions
>
> How do you think? Someone knows any other knowledge about locale?

Replacing process_log_prefix_padding() with isdigit()+strtol() is
just refactoring and doesn't provide any new feature. So they
basically should work in the same way. If the behavior of isdigit()+strtol()
can be different from process_log_prefix_padding(), I'd prefer to
the latter option you suggested, i.e., give up using isdigit()+strtol().

OTOH, of course if the behaviors of them are the same,
I'm ok to use isdigit()+strtol(), though.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2021-10-12 04:33:39 Re: postgres_fdw: misplaced? comments in connection.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-10-12 03:21:34 Re: Corruption with IMMUTABLE functions in index expression.