From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Temporary, In-memory Postgres DB? |
Date: | 2007-11-07 15:17:20 |
Message-ID: | 4731D700.1070101@cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/07 09:03, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
> This is a real longshot, but here goes...
>
>
>
> Is there such a thing as a temporary, probably in-memory, version of a
> Postgres DB? Sort of like SQLite, only with the features/function of
> PG? A DB like this would exist inside of, and for the duration of, a
> script/program that created it, then vanish when the script/program
> ends.
>
>
>
> Probably not, but if not, then this would be (IMO) a great addition to
> have, something that'd really make it distinct from MySQL . I'd use
> SQLite, but I want to have stored functions and other "real" database
> features that it just doesn't have.
If you have enough RAM, and your database is small enough, the OS
will eventually cache the whole thing.
I know that's not exactly what you're talking about, but I think
it's as close as you'll get.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHMdcAS9HxQb37XmcRAqD9AJ4usfOq49ApqnLOz9advUnRmc7q2QCdFa8s
xAL+tMf4Xu4T4hGhvUCzomA=
=QmE5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-07 15:23:06 | Re: any way for ORDER BY x to imply NULLS FIRST in 8.3? |
Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2007-11-07 15:13:17 | Re: prepared statements suboptimal? |