Re: subversion support?

From: cyclix <cyclix(at)optusnet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tim Goodaire <tgoodair(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: subversion support?
Date: 2007-11-07 13:50:46
Message-ID: 4731C2B6.20105@optusnet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I would be interested as well. Our changes are perhaps once or twice a
week in development but its nice to make sure that its being tracked.

Mario

Tim Goodaire wrote:
> Robert,
>
> I'd like to have a copy of your script if you're willing to share. We're
> currently working on schema control stuff, and your script may be useful.
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:23:39PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>> On Wednesday 24 October 2007 15:11, Roberts, Jon wrote:
>>> Yeah. I think having to save the function to disk and then leave pgAdmin
>>> to execute subversion commands is going through hoops.
>>>
>>> Also, pgAdmin should be integrated so that you are notified if the function
>>> in the database is different from the last committed version. A visual
>>> diff should be there so you can see what the differences are.
>>>
>> We have a script that runs nightly that dumps tables / functions to file, and
>> then checks it in automagically to svn, which sends an email of the diffs.
>> Perhaps that would work for you?
>>
>> --
>> Robert Treat
>> Database Architect
>> http://www.omniti.com
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHMcK2Wo7/TvkZs+IRAh3OAJ99c7oYoRjo4N3PpgcCBs2R5xX0CwCfQ+5b
yhL6Eldt6tug6qnYmCAHRDs=
=dkj2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rainer Bauer 2007-11-07 14:16:24 Re: Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-07 13:38:59 Re: any way for ORDER BY x to imply NULLS FIRST in 8.3?