Re: Visibility map thoughts

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Visibility map thoughts
Date: 2007-11-07 18:20:12
Message-ID: 4731AD7C.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2007 at 8:18 AM, in message <473077AD(dot)30101(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> The indexam API needs to be modified as well, because there's currently
> no API to return index tuples from an index.

I know this is tangential, but expanding the types of selection
criteria which can be applied to index entries (beyond equality and
range tests) might fall out of this, yes?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-11-07 18:56:02 Re: Weird type selection choice
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-11-07 16:58:49 Re: Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a /