From: | Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Kevin Hunter <hunteke(at)earlham(dot)edu>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Postgres WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Training events policy ... first test case |
Date: | 2007-11-04 15:53:47 |
Message-ID: | 472DEB0B.2060207@otg-nc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote:
> Chander Ganesan wrote:
>> I *still* think (and am apparently still ignored...) there should be
>> limits placed on the number of events a vendor can list...either by
>> type, or by vendor. A vendor is less likely to post "training spam",
>> and more likely to post events they really plan to run when they have
>> a limit as to their total listings...
>
> The problem is that we don't want to prevent legitimate courses being
> listed. As PostgreSQL grows, and the companies around it grow there
> will inevitably be more and more courses scheduled, especially by the
> bigger multi-national players.
>
> Regards, Dave
I understand, however the issue now isn't one of growth...IMHO it's one
of growth being stymied because we have a list of training events that
doesn't represent classes *actually* being offered. Seems like at the
very least a short term "band aid" solution could be applied while we
try to figure out a way to adequately and fairly address the issue...
I'm sure as time goes on we'll come to better understand the needs of
companies that legitimately offer training courses.
--
Chander Ganesan
Open Technology Group, Inc.
One Copley Parkway, Suite 210
Morrisville, NC 27560
Phone: 877-258-8987/919-463-0999
http://www.otg-nc.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chander Ganesan | 2007-11-04 15:58:25 | Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-11-04 15:22:42 | Re: Training events policy ... first test case |