Re: Training events policy ... first test case

Tom Lane wrote:
> Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com> writes:
>
>> I'm still opposed to event spam..which everyone seems to conveniently
>> ignore when I bring it up. :-( .
>>
>
> Oh, we hear you, we're just not sure what to do about it ...
>
>
>> How about trying to limit the number of events that a company can have
>> on the list at a time? Say a maximum of 5 events listed at a time?
>> That's fairly even handed, and would force folks to post courses that
>> they would consider would have some likelihood of running?
>>
>
> I don't much like this one, because it would skew the playing field in
> favor of smaller companies. If there were someone out there able to
> field 100 events, but they could only advertise 5, how is that good for
> either them or the potential attendees?
>
First off, I apologize..I didn't see this before I sent out my last
message (where I said I felt like I was being ignored..).
> Conversely, I think your ultimate concern is with companies that can
> really only field 5 events but advertise 100 to see what will happen :-(
>
That's the gist of it, but I don't see how you can differentiate between
the two and be "fair".

I think that if the time came where someone said "this is too
restrictive, I can field lots of events and want to" then this could be
revisited. At present, I don't think there is anyone that can do so. I
also don't think the training market for PG events is big enough to
support such a thing anyways.. Also, keep in mind that this isn't the
only venue for advertising events. Lots of other venues exist... This
is just one of them...

Besides, someone would be able to list their 5 upcoming courses and as
soon as one drops off add another to the end. If you consider admin
courses alone that's listing a calendar 5 months in advance (potentially).
> Maybe we should try to discourage that sort of gamesmanship by instead
> allowing/supporting ad campaigns on the order of "call us, we'll bring
> our training to you", or "vote here for course X offered in city Y at
> time Z".
>
I think that might be worse than the situation we have now..

chander

> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Chander Ganesan
Open Technology Group, Inc.
One Copley Parkway, Suite 210
Morrisville, NC 27560
Phone: 877-258-8987/919-463-0999
http://www.otg-nc.com