From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Cache lookup failed for relation X [was: DROP FUNCTION cache lookup failed for relation X] |
Date: | 2007-11-01 08:19:24 |
Message-ID: | 47298C0C.50508@paradise.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Still in the think-about-it mode, personally ... my proposed fix is
> certainly much too invasive to consider back-patching, so unless someone
> comes up with a way-simpler idea, it's 8.3 material at best ...
>
>
I ran into a variant of this today - simply creating and dropping a
table repeatedly while doing \d from another session:
Session 1:
perl -e 'while (1) {print "drop table if exists z0; \n create table z0
(a int, b int);\n drop table z0;\n"}' | psql cache > z0.log 2>&1
Session 2:
psql cache
=# \d
ERROR: cache lookup failed for relation 945897 (in RelationIsVisible,
namespace.c:406)
The previous discussion centered around working on on locking in
dependency.c whilst dropping related objects - but does this apply when
there is just one? Anyway I tried to understand what was happening and
the attached rather hacky patch seems to cure the behaviour - So I've
submitted it as a discussion aid, rather than 'the way of fixing
this'... since I'm hoping there is a better way :-)
regards
Mark
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
namspace.c.patch | text/x-patch | 2.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gokulakannan Somasundaram | 2007-11-01 10:05:50 | Re: Clarification on a Time travel feature |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-01 03:33:46 | Re: psql show dbsize? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-01 12:08:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Cache lookup failed for relation X [was: DROP FUNCTION cache lookup failed for relation X] |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-11-01 06:05:35 | actualised czech faq |