> By "last patch" you mean
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-10/msg00409.php
> ?
Sorry for confusion, I meant this one:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-10/msg00217.php
Is it the same as the commited one?
> If so that's about as fast as it's likely to get. 22 tables is well
> beyond what I'd consider reasonable to run through the exhaustive
> planner. You should try geqo again.
OK, no problem...
Anyway, many thanks for the quick patches!
Kuba