Re: Change ereport level for QueuePartitionConstraintValidation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Change ereport level for QueuePartitionConstraintValidation
Date: 2019-07-16 01:26:07
Message-ID: 4723.1563240367@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Would anyone complain if we made them all INFO?

That would be remarkably horrid, because that makes them unsuppressable.

I'm generally for having these be less in-your-face, not more so.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-07-16 02:40:22 Re: Change ereport level for QueuePartitionConstraintValidation
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-07-16 01:21:59 Re: PG 12 draft release notes