From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Changelog and 7.1.3 release |
Date: | 2001-09-07 21:26:02 |
Message-ID: | 4722.999897962@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Can we come to some kind of decision on this before going beta?
>> The point of these changelogs was to show the changes between beta and rc
>> versions, because those were not necessarily recorded in the HISTORY file.
>> However, putting these in the tarball is questionable (if you already
>> downloaded the tarball then you might as well proceed with installing it),
>> still having them there now is even more questionable (who cares?), and
>> making them for minor releases is redundant and confusing. I vote for
>> removing them.
I agree with Peter on this; I don't see much value in putting these
files into the distribution, and none at all in preserving them
indefinitely.
I'd suggest that the future procedure ought to be to pull a changelog
from CVS but put it beside the tarball on the FTP server, not inside
the tarball (and certainly not back into CVS --- that's redundant).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-07 21:26:05 | Re: Escaping strings for inclusion into SQL queries |
Previous Message | Giles Lean | 2001-09-07 21:21:19 | Re: Log rotation? |