From: | rm_rs(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Release notes introductory text |
Date: | 2007-10-15 23:24:54 |
Message-ID: | 4713F6C6.4040201@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>> How exactly do you expect the software to get from a .0 to a .1 release,
>>> or to have addressed the bugs that might bite you when it does get to .1,
>>> if you aren't helping to test it?
>>>
>> In most environments I've seen, developer and QA systems don't hesitate
>> to move to .0 releases (or even beta). I agree with Joshua that it's
>> nerve wracking to move _production_ systems to .0 releases from most
>> software vendors.
>>
>
> My philosophy is that the final QA environment should be as close to
> the production environment as can be arranged, but that difference in
> the development and initial test environments contribute to
> robustness.
>
Sorry if I implied otherwise - I was assuming an environment
where QA has multiple environments; one of which clearly
should be the same as production.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Serge.Perrier | 2007-10-16 07:05:09 | Security with PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2007-10-15 22:31:32 | Re: Release notes introductory text |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-16 02:50:39 | Slony for upgrades |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2007-10-15 22:31:32 | Re: Release notes introductory text |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-10-16 00:24:13 | Re: UTF8 on Debian |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-15 23:17:12 | Re: pgsql: Add sample text search dictionary templates and parsers, to |