| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Dennis White <dwhite(at)seawardmoon(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Can a long running procedure detect when smart shutdown is pending? |
| Date: | 2024-07-06 13:38:22 |
| Message-ID: | 471035.1720273102@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 14:12 -0400, Dennis White wrote:
>> My project's DB has a mutli-step stored procedure using Transaction Control that may take 30 minutes or more to complete.
>> I am curious if there is a way to make it more smart shutdown friendly so it can stop between steps?
> I don't think there is a direct way to do that in SQL; that would require a new
> system function that exposes canAcceptConnections() in SQL.
It's worse than that: the state variables involved are local to the
postmaster, so you wouldn't get the right answer in a backend even
if the function were reachable.
> What you could do is use the dblink extension to connect to the local database.
> If you get an error "the database system is shutting down", there is a smart
> shutdown in progress.
This'd probably work. Ugly, but ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Nolan | 2024-07-06 13:50:42 | Re: Alignment check |
| Previous Message | Peter J. Holzer | 2024-07-06 11:49:05 | Re: confused about material view locks please explain |