From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vacuums on large busy databases |
Date: | 2006-09-14 18:43:49 |
Message-ID: | 470FED70-B3BA-4B6C-A6B1-DFD8882746B2@fastcrypt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Francisco
On 14-Sep-06, at 1:36 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Dave Cramer writes:
>
>> What is effective_cache set to ?
>
> Increasing this seems to have helped significantly a web app. Load
> times seem magnitudes faster.
>
> Increased it to effective_cache_size = 12288 # 96MB
>
> What is a reasonable number?
> I estimate I have at least 1 to 2 GB free of memory.
You are using 6G of memory for something else ?
effective cache should be set to 75% of free memory
>
> Don't want to get too carried away right now with too many
> changes.. because right now we have very few connections to that
> database (usually less than 10), but I expect it to go to a norm of
> 20+.. so need to make sure I won't make changes that will be a
> problem in that scenario.
>
> So far only see one setting that can be an issue: work_mem so have
> it set to only 32768.
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-14 18:49:43 | Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected |
Previous Message | Alan Hodgson | 2006-09-14 18:36:03 | Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected |