Re: Locales and Encodings

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Locales and Encodings
Date: 2007-10-12 16:02:08
Message-ID: 470F9A80.8050200@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Oct 12, 2007, at 10:19 , Gregory Stark wrote:
>
>> It would make Postgres inconsistent and less integrated with the rest
>> of the
>> OS. How do you explain that Postgres doesn't follow the system's
>> configurations and the collations don't agree with the system
>> collations?
>
> How is this fundamentally different from PostgreSQL using a separate
> users/roles system than the OS?
Even more, eliminating dependencies on a OS's correct implementation of
locale stuff appears A Good Thing to me. I wonder if a compile time
option to use ICU in 8.4 should be considered, regarding all those
lengthy threads about encoding/locale/collation problems.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-10-12 16:15:57 Re: Locales and Encodings
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-10-12 15:56:06 Re: Locales and Encodings