Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Date: 2007-10-09 20:37:36
Message-ID: 470BE690.2000501@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new
>> stuff after it has been declared?
>
> We allow /contrib to be more lax about beta changes.

Why? When people were complaining about not being able to use TSearch
because their ISPs wouldn't install contrib modules we couldn't
understand why they would think that way. If we are going to be less
stringent about /contrib, maybe they were right to cautious.

/D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-10-09 20:41:32 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-10-09 20:36:28 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-10-09 20:41:32 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-10-09 20:36:28 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review