| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-09 20:37:36 |
| Message-ID: | 470BE690.2000501@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new
>> stuff after it has been declared?
>
> We allow /contrib to be more lax about beta changes.
Why? When people were complaining about not being able to use TSearch
because their ISPs wouldn't install contrib modules we couldn't
understand why they would think that way. If we are going to be less
stringent about /contrib, maybe they were right to cautious.
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-09 20:41:32 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-10-09 20:36:28 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-09 20:41:32 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-10-09 20:36:28 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |