Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Date: 2007-10-09 17:33:33
Message-ID: 470BBB6D.7060203@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>
>>> I don't see how timing has anything to do with this. You could have
>>> added it between beta1 and beta2 after sufficient hackers discussion.
>>>
>> Uh, it *was* after beta1.
>>
>
> Oh, so it didn't hold up beta1 --- that's good.
>
>

No it's not.

Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new
stuff after it has been declared?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-10-09 18:14:01 pgsql: Replace a reference to "start_log_collector" with
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-10-09 17:11:48 Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2007-10-09 17:53:42 Re: Timezone database changes
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2007-10-09 17:16:08 Re: type money causes unrestorable dump