| From: | Till Toenges <tt(at)kyon(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: statement caching link on jdbc page |
| Date: | 2007-10-06 12:48:43 |
| Message-ID: | 4707842B.3000901@kyon.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris Jurka wrote:
> I think this is a good idea, but I would include a link to JDBC4 as well
> because despite our poor support it is the way of the future.
Ok.
> I hoping we fold in the copy stuff so that disappears and until we have
> some actual documentation/experience with the statement caching version,
> I'm not sure how prominently I would like to promote it.
I reduced that to just mentioning the extras page. Or should i remove it
completely?
> Yeah, since we don't even maintain 7.X anymore, mentioning 6.X and 0.2
> is a little pointless.
There are two tables now, supported versions and archived versions. Is
the split ok?
Till
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| download.html | text/html | 18.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2007-10-07 19:48:53 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2856: Jdbc 4 connector running on JDK 1.6 should |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2007-10-05 13:08:24 | Re: statement caching link on jdbc page |