From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_cancel_backend() does not work with buzz queries |
Date: | 2007-10-03 09:10:52 |
Message-ID: | 47035C9C.7050507@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-ru-general |
Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> I'm sorry I mean not HUP but KILL
Hmm...
>> datname | usename | procpid | current_query | waiting |
>> query_start
>> -----------+------------------+---------+-----------------+---------+-------------------------------
>> transport | belostotskaya_la | 20530 | select * from c | f |
>> 2007-10-02 05:05:28.908687+04
>> transport=# select pg_catalog.pg_cancel_backend(20530);
>> pg_cancel_backend
>> -------------------
>> t
>> datname | usename | procpid | current_query | waiting |
>> query_start
>> -----------+------------------+---------+-----------------+---------+-------------------------------
>> transport | belostotskaya_la | 20530 | select * from c | f |
>> 2007-10-02 05:05:28.908687+04
1. Is it always the same query?
2. Does the client still think it's connected?
3. Is that query using up CPU, or just idling?
4. Anything odd in pg_locks for the problem pid?
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-10-03 10:18:32 | Re: pg_cancel_backend() does not work with buzz queries |
Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2007-10-03 08:44:16 | Re: pg_cancel_backend() does not work with buzz queries |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nick Gazaloff | 2007-10-03 09:12:23 | Re: pg_cancel_backend() не снимает зависшие транзакции |
Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2007-10-03 08:44:56 | Re: pg_cancel_backend() не снимает зависшие транзакции |