Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Paul Lindner <lindner(at)inuus(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer
Date: 2007-10-01 21:04:00
Message-ID: 470160C0.6020907@opencloud.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Paul Lindner wrote:

> Why doesn't the Postgres JDBC driver use cursors for ResultSets
> instead of creating prepared statements? Is this not supported in the
> v3 protocol? (I'd answer this question myself, but no time to read
> code at the moment...)

It uses portals which are the v3 equivalent of cursors.

If you are serious about solving these problems I think you really need
to go and read the v3 protocol spec at a minimum.

-O

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2007-10-01 21:06:50 Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2007-10-01 20:57:04 Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer