From: | "Martin Langhoff" <martin(dot)langhoff(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "XS Devel" <server-devel(at)lists(dot)laptop(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pg 8.3 tuning recommendations for embedded low-memory device (for OLPC :-) ) |
Date: | 2008-09-15 21:46:58 |
Message-ID: | 46a038f90809151446q6834c55foa3be3206c5bc9847@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
> Call me crazy, but I think you need to drop postgres and maybe even template0
> databases from the system, just to reduce overall footprint, plus gives you
> less databases to have to keep track of wrt autovacuum and such.
What would be the impact of running w/o postgres and template0? They
seem to take 13MB on a freshly init'd Pg -- I can afford to have them
there if needed. In general, I am not expecting to be super-tight on
disk... (not yet at least)
> Also, if your disk is limited, you might want to play with the
> autovacuum_max_freeze_age and the corresponding vacuum settings to try and
> reduce pg_clog size.
Intriguing. I'll look into those.
thanks!
m
--
martin(dot)langhoff(at)gmail(dot)com
martin(at)laptop(dot)org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-09-15 21:52:08 | Re: Pg 8.3 tuning recommendations for embedded low-memory device (for OLPC :-) ) |
Previous Message | Martin Langhoff | 2008-09-15 21:43:30 | Re: Pg 8.3 tuning recommendations for embedded low-memory device (for OLPC :-) ) |