From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Date: | 2007-09-29 18:45:35 |
Message-ID: | 46FE9D4F.8010405@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 9/26/2007 6:11 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> In an attempt to get "Postgres" more widely used, I propose changing
> "PostgreSQL" to "Postgres" in the documentation when there is more than
> one mention of "PostgreSQL" in the same paragraph. The same could be done
> with the FAQ.
If you are going to change all the documentation anyway, is there a
strong reason not to change it to Postgres all the way?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2007-09-29 19:03:19 | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-09-29 16:55:03 | Re: Dropping postgres as a whole. |