Tom Lane wrote:
> adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org (Andrew Dunstan) writes:
>
>> Remove "convert 'blah' using conversion_name" facility, because if it
>> produces text it is an encoding hole and if not it's incompatible
>> with the spec, whatever the spec means (which we're not sure about anyway).
>>
>
> It's not critical, but just for future reference, you forgot to bump
> catversion here. Which you should've because adding/removing built-in
> functions renders the backend incompatible with the system catalogs.
>
>
>
Oops. You're right. Sorry.
cheers
andrew