| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Daniel B(dot) Thurman" <dant(at)cdkkt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pgadmin-Support (E-mail)" <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication Sets |
| Date: | 2007-09-22 08:08:28 |
| Message-ID: | 46F4CD7C.2060604@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support |
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> What are the "rules" when defining the ID's for the replication sets
> for both the master and slaves? I was not able to glean from the
> online help if it makes any difference as to what values are chosen
> for the IDs when creating a new replication set and whether or not
> there should or should not be dependencies. For example would
> this work?
Just use a unique ID for each object of each type. It doesn't matter if
you use ID #1 for a node as well as a table for example.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Horvath Gabor | 2007-09-22 12:06:17 | 1.8-Beta5 Bug: sequence properties dialog produces wrong sql statement order |
| Previous Message | Daniel B. Thurman | 2007-09-22 01:35:55 | Replication Sets |