| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | ML PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is this good spec for a PostgreSQL server? |
| Date: | 2007-09-20 12:55:33 |
| Message-ID: | 46F26DC5.90503@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/20/07 05:43, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 08:40 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Yes, I think that it's a bit excessive but the company can afford it so why not... :)
>> Lucky SOB.
>>
>> I can't get my company to spring for a dual-core 2GB system with
>> SATA drives.
>>
>
> hehe.. I'll end up running it on a low-end desktop w/ 1GB ram and a
> celeron 2G processor w/ ~30GB data/month.
I probably would too, if I wasn't half-way across the country from
the DC.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG8m3FS9HxQb37XmcRAmrnAJ404YJyOqnJGDxviAjFWAlmMdyaawCcCM/a
Gud2Ef//IuG3YBGSn8Gb/uU=
=SO8R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-20 14:41:00 | Re: Postgresql and SSL |
| Previous Message | marcelo Cortez | 2007-09-20 12:13:18 | Re: Tsearch2 - spanish |