| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Marshall, Steve" <smarshall(at)wsi(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded |
| Date: | 2007-09-16 15:57:46 |
| Message-ID: | 46ED527A.4090108@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>> yeah testing that patch now (seems to apply just fine on -HEAD) but it
>> seems that there is something strange going on because I just got:
>
> ! ERROR: could not read block 2 of relation 1663/16384/2606: read only 0 of 8192 bytes
>
> Is that repeatable? What sort of filesystem are you testing on?
> (soft-mounted NFS by any chance?)
doesn't seem to be repeatable :-(
on the postitive side - the pltcl patch does seem to fix the mentioned
regression failures quagga triggered earlier this year. I did about a
dozends of full buildfarm runs with that patch and about ten manual
executions of the pltcl regression tests without any sign of
misbehaviour so this seems like a clear candidate for at least -HEAD.
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-09-16 16:36:45 | Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-16 15:14:55 | Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-09-16 16:47:28 | Re: HOT synced with HEAD |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-09-16 02:05:55 | Re: [HACKERS] invalidly encoded strings |