| From: | Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem |
| Date: | 2007-09-12 18:46:01 |
| Message-ID: | 46E833E9.3020001@janestcapital.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Scott Marlowe wrote:
>I'm getting more and more motivated to rewrite the vacuum docs. I
>think a rewrite from the ground up might be best... I keep seeing
>people doing vacuum full on this list and I'm thinking it's as much
>because of the way the docs represent vacuum full as anything. Is
>that true for you?
>
>
>
It's true for me.
I turned off autovacuum as I was getting occassional hangs, which I
thought were the result of vacuums (and have signifigantly decreased
since I did that), and went nightly vacuum fulls, and vacuum
full/reindex/cluster on the weekends (which I now realize is redundant).
Brian
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikko Partio | 2007-09-12 18:56:13 | Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-09-12 18:28:14 | Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem |